Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Poverty Impacts Vocabulary

I spent the last two days at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, the site of the summer Gear Up program for Native American youth.  On Monday morning I assisted staff in assessing over 120 eighth graders in reading.  It was as I expected.  The students are orally fluent, they can read the words with the best of them but when it comes to making meaning and retelling what they read or having a grasp of the meaning of individual words (vocabulary), we have our work cut out for us.  It is really compelling to see their needs and not be able to instantaneously apply a FIX!
A side benefit of my trip was becoming acquainted with some of the staff selected to spend the next five weeks with these students.  Young people who have a fire in their bellies to make a difference for these kids.  I was lucky enough to sit and discuss education with four of them yesterday afternoon.  They have such dreams about being able to make changes in a system.  To teach, unlike they were taught!  To really care about whether or not these students benefit from their time at this summer program.  I was enriched by their remarks and the conversation with them underlined my passion for what I am doing.
I recently listed to a podcast by Michael Graves regarding his study of vocabulary instruction and its importance.  He stressed the deficiencies caused by poverty.  I would underscore the reality of truth in his remarks.  How can these young people make meaning while reading when their "theory of the world in their heads" lacks the meaning of words read and heard.  I am on a search to gather some of the very best "word" activities to assist teachers to improve vocabulary of their students.

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Magic Bullet?

Recently I have been asked by two very wise people to review a product/program for them as it relates to offering assistance to struggling readers.  I will do what I have been asked but I do not believe there has been or will ever be a program/product created that fits the needs and serves as the "magic bullet" for reading.  I DO however believe we have a strategy necessary for cleaning up the problem of struggling readers and that is effective teachers.  I so believe it is the teacher working with a child on the individual needs of that child that will break the cycle of poor reading.  We have phenomenal assessments to ascertain the problems or gaps children have in their reading skills and strategies.  It takes someone who is skilled in applying the correct strategies and skills and teaching the child to use those when reading.
I was not a proponent of "Reading First' as my criticism was that if any teacher or school would allocate the significant time necessary to teach reading and intervene with appropriate strategies, then children would learn to read and succeed.  Reading First just caused districts to hold teachers accountable to using effective strategies with children for a great amount of time and the success was in the practice not the program.
The same for "Reading Recovery" - one teacher applying the very best strategies for a child and allowing the child significant opportunities to apply and benefit from the tutorial of a skilled teacher.
I have never been and will never be in agreement with computer based turoring that takes the teacher out of the formula.  Children should not be asked to learn without a teacher present to observe and offer the feedback and wisdom necesary for good pedagogy to take place.
So, you may ask, what do your propose?  I recommend we offer professional development to teachers related to effective assessment, teach them how to use the assessments given to drive their instruction, and then arm them with the most effective strateiges and research on the craft of teaching reading.  Provide these teachers will constant coaching and feedback to empower them to do their best while teaching reading and allow the work to happen over time.  Students have struggled with reading because they haven't been taught.  All children need to be able to be the best readers they can be by third grade.  Children in Kindergarten through third grade should focus on reading, writing, and mathematical thinking ONLY.  All other contents should be taught in the context of reading, writing, and mathematical thinking. 

Thursday, May 26, 2011

To Be Continued

Recently I resigned from a position where I was spending more time on "administrivia" than on meaningful work with teachers and students in schools.  I am getting too old for that kind of wasteful practice.  With the little time I have left and to really make a difference, I need to expend my efforts where the real action is - in schools and classrooms.  Therefore, I am embarking on a personal challenge to metacognate more, advance effective practices with teachers and administrators, and continue to use the data collected to assist schools in making the best decisions for students.
My writing and thinking shared here will reflect my beliefs and experiences gathered from many years as an educator.  I may share my opinions based on observations in many classrooms and schools.  I most definitely will elaborate on my ideas formulated as a parent and grandparent.  And this blog will only be as good as the comments of those who read and react.  So let us set forth on a journey.